|
Paul E. Meehl
1920–2003 · clinical psychologist and philosopher of science, Minnesota
what he did In Clinical versus Statistical Prediction (Meehl, 1954) he compared clinicians' forecasts about patients with forecasts from simple actuarial rules, in the studies then published, and found the rules as good or better almost every time [paraphrase, not a quotation]. Clinicians did not thank him. With Lee Cronbach he wrote the classic paper on construct validity, on what it means for a test to measure something you cannot see directly. His methodological papers are still assigned. Meehl (1967) pointed out a paradox: in physics, better measurement makes a theory's test harder to pass; in much of psychology, where the test is only whether a difference is non-zero, better measurement makes it easier [paraphrase, not a quotation]. Meehl (1978) blamed the slow progress of "soft" psychology partly on that habit of significance testing [paraphrase, not a quotation]. why he is here His 1954 book is the starting point of algorithm aversion, and his methodology papers sit at the start of the replication timeline. in the tour: the forking corridor has a placard called "Meehl: clinical and statistical" ··· Primary works and sources
see also
|
![]()
rev. Oct 24 2026